State v. Stevens

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stevens

409 S.W.3d 583, 2013 WL 5379829, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 24, 2013·No. No. ED 99147·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rocky Lee Stevens (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of possession of a methamphetamine precursor drug with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine (“meth”).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rocky Lee Stevens (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of possession of a methamphetamine precursor drug with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine (“meth”).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Stevens, 409 S.W.3d 583, 2013 WL 5379829, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

409 S.W.3d 583 (State v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.