State v. Stevens

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stevens

899 S.W.2d 604, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1148

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Stevens. Read the opinion of the Court — 845 S.W.2d 124 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 1995·No. Docket Nos. WD 48695, WD 50178·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lewis A. Stevens appeals his convictions of forcible rape and incest and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He asserts that the state failed to make a prima facie case and that the prosecutor’s closing argument was improper. He also contends that his post-conviction attorney abandoned him. We find no merit to his claims and affirm the convictions and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Because we discern no jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lewis A. Stevens appeals his convictions of forcible rape and incest and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He asserts that the state failed to make a prima facie case and that the prosecutor’s closing argument was improper. He also contends that his post-conviction attorney abandoned him. We find no merit to his claims and affirm the convictions and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Because we discern no jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Stevens, 899 S.W.2d 604, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1148 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

899 S.W.2d 604 (State v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.