State v. Stevens

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Stevens

755 So. 2d 261, 1999 La. App. LEXIS 1612, 1999 WL 350844

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 28, 1999

DocketNos. 32,664-KW to 32,669-KW

StatusPublished

This text of 755 So. 2d 261 (State v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stevens, 755 So. 2d 261, 1999 La. App. LEXIS 1612, 1999 WL 350844 (La. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinions

11 WRIT DENIED.

Defense counsel’s affidavit of verification filed in support of the Motion for Speedy Trial fails to satisfy La.C.Cr.P. art. 701.-D(l), and therefore said motion is invalid.

Defendant makes a sparse showing relative to his complaints pertaining to the bail obligations set in Nos. 90,173 — 90, 175. The court further notes the alleged danger to the cooperating witness.

Accordingly, on the showing made, this writ is DENIED in its entirety.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11 WRIT DENIED.

Defense counsel’s affidavit of verification filed in support of the Motion for Speedy Trial fails to satisfy La.C.Cr.P. art. 701.-D(l), and therefore said motion is invalid.

Defendant makes a sparse showing relative to his complaints pertaining to the bail obligations set in Nos. 90,173 — 90, 175. The court further notes the alleged danger to the cooperating witness.

Accordingly, on the showing made, this writ is DENIED in its entirety.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

755 So. 2d 261, 1999 La. App. LEXIS 1612, 1999 WL 350844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stevens-lactapp-1999.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack