State v. Steven K.

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. Steven K.

671 N.W.2d 777, 267 Neb. 55, 2003 Neb. LEXIS 184

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 5, 2003

DocketS-02-941, S-02-942

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 671 N.W.2d 777 (State v. Steven K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Steven K., 671 N.W.2d 777, 267 Neb. 55, 2003 Neb. LEXIS 184 (Neb. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Hendry, CJ.

In these appeals, the Douglas County Separate Juvenile Court denied a juvenile’s motion to terminate the court’s jurisdiction *56 and a juvenile’s petition to dismiss after each juvenile married. The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed after determining that marriage terminates the minority of a juvenile and, therefore, ends the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. See In re Interest of Steven K., 11 Neb. App. 828, 661 N.W.2d 320 (2003). We granted the State’s petition for further review. We dismiss one of the appeals, and in the other, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Before reaching the legal issues presented for review, it is the duty of an appellate court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the matter before it. Chambers v. Lautenbaugh, 263 Neb. 920, 644 N.W.2d 540 (2002). While it is not a constitutional prerequisite for jurisdiction, the existence of an actual case or controversy is necessary for the exercise of judicial power. Id.

A moot case is one which seeks to determine a question which does not rest upon existing facts or rights, in which the issues presented are no longer alive. Id. A case becomes moot when the issues initially presented in litigation cease to exist or the litigants lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome of litigation. Id. Thus, this court must first determine whether Steven K.’s appeal is moot.

In case No. S-02-941, the record before us indicates that Steven was bom on July 12, 1984, and has since attained the age of 19 years. As a result, regardless of marital status, the jurisdiction of the juvenile court as to Steven has terminated pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-245 and 43-247 (Cum. Supp. 2002). As such, we determine the legal issue presented in this appeal is moot and further determine that said issue does not qualify for review under the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine.

In view of the conclusion that this case presents no justiciable issue, the appeal is dismissed.

In case No. S-02-942, having reviewed the briefs and record, and having heard oral arguments, we conclude on further review that the decision of the Court of Appeals concerning Cassandra M. in In re Interest of Steven K., supra, is correct and accordingly affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Appeal in No. S-02-941 dismissed.

Judgment in No. S-02-942 affirmed.

McCormack, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hendry, CJ.

In these appeals, the Douglas County Separate Juvenile Court denied a juvenile’s motion to terminate the court’s jurisdiction *56 and a juvenile’s petition to dismiss after each juvenile married. The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed after determining that marriage terminates the minority of a juvenile and, therefore, ends the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. See In re Interest of Steven K., 11 Neb. App. 828, 661 N.W.2d 320 (2003). We granted the State’s petition for further review. We dismiss one of the appeals, and in the other, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Before reaching the legal issues presented for review, it is the duty of an appellate court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the matter before it. Chambers v. Lautenbaugh, 263 Neb. 920, 644 N.W.2d 540 (2002). While it is not a constitutional prerequisite for jurisdiction, the existence of an actual case or controversy is necessary for the exercise of judicial power. Id.

A moot case is one which seeks to determine a question which does not rest upon existing facts or rights, in which the issues presented are no longer alive. Id. A case becomes moot when the issues initially presented in litigation cease to exist or the litigants lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome of litigation. Id. Thus, this court must first determine whether Steven K.’s appeal is moot.

In case No. S-02-941, the record before us indicates that Steven was bom on July 12, 1984, and has since attained the age of 19 years. As a result, regardless of marital status, the jurisdiction of the juvenile court as to Steven has terminated pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-245 and 43-247 (Cum. Supp. 2002). As such, we determine the legal issue presented in this appeal is moot and further determine that said issue does not qualify for review under the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine.

In view of the conclusion that this case presents no justiciable issue, the appeal is dismissed.

In case No. S-02-942, having reviewed the briefs and record, and having heard oral arguments, we conclude on further review that the decision of the Court of Appeals concerning Cassandra M. in In re Interest of Steven K., supra, is correct and accordingly affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Appeal in No. S-02-941 dismissed.

Judgment in No. S-02-942 affirmed.

McCormack, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 N.W.2d 777, 267 Neb. 55, 2003 Neb. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-steven-k-neb-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack