State v. Steptoe

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Steptoe

366 S.W.3d 86, 2012 WL 1623582, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 628

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2012

DocketED 97005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 366 S.W.3d 86 (State v. Steptoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Steptoe, 366 S.W.3d 86, 2012 WL 1623582, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carynne Steptoe (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered upon her conviction of third-degree assault after a bench trial in the Circuit Court of the *87 City of St. Louis. Defendant claims the trial court erred in: (1) finding her guilty of third-degree assault because the State produced insufficient evidence to support her conviction; and (2) allowing the State to introduce video evidence not disclosed prior to trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment of conviction pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI