State v. Steptoe

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Steptoe

35 P. 690, 3 Idaho 754, 1894 Ida. LEXIS 1

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 P. 690 (State v. Steptoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Steptoe, 35 P. 690, 3 Idaho 754, 1894 Ida. LEXIS 1 (Idaho 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

HUSTON, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Bingham county dismissing an appeal to said court from the police magistrate’s court for the city of Pocatello in said county. The defendant was convicted of vagrancy in the police court of the city of Pocatello. An attempt was made to take an appeal, but it seems from the record none of the requisites of the statute necessary to the taking of an appeal were complied with. No appearance in this court is made by or on behalf of appellant. The appeal is dismissed.

Morgan and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HUSTON, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Bingham county dismissing an appeal to said court from the police magistrate’s court for the city of Pocatello in said county. The defendant was convicted of vagrancy in the police court of the city of Pocatello. An attempt was made to take an appeal, but it seems from the record none of the requisites of the statute necessary to the taking of an appeal were complied with. No appearance in this court is made by or on behalf of appellant. The appeal is dismissed.

Morgan and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 P. 690, 3 Idaho 754, 1894 Ida. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-steptoe-idaho-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack