State v. Stephenson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Stephenson

204 A.3d 702, 331 Conn. 914

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 3, 2019·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Vishal K. Garg, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The state's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, *703187 Conn. App. 20, 201 A.3d 427 (AC 40250), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court improperly raise sua sponte the issue of sufficiency of evidence with respect to the element of intent?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence was insufficient on the element of the defendant's intent to commit the crime of tampering with physical evidence under General Statutes § 53a-49 (a) (2) ?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vishal K. Garg, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The state's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, *703187 Conn. App. 20, 201 A.3d 427 (AC 40250), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court improperly raise sua sponte the issue of sufficiency of evidence with respect to the element of intent?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence was insufficient on the element of the defendant's intent to commit the crime of tampering with physical evidence under General Statutes § 53a-49 (a) (2) ?"

State v. Stephenson, 204 A.3d 702, 331 Conn. 914 (Colo. 2019).

Pincite

204 A.3d 702 (State v. Stephenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related