State v. Stephenson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Stephenson

204 A.3d 702, 331 Conn. 914

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedApril 3, 2019

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 204 A.3d 702 (State v. Stephenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stephenson, 204 A.3d 702, 331 Conn. 914 (Colo. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Vishal K. Garg, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The state's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, *703187 Conn. App. 20, 201 A.3d 427 (AC 40250), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court improperly raise sua sponte the issue of sufficiency of evidence with respect to the element of intent?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence was insufficient on the element of the defendant's intent to commit the crime of tampering with physical evidence under General Statutes § 53a-49 (a) (2) ?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vishal K. Garg, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The state's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, *703187 Conn. App. 20, 201 A.3d 427 (AC 40250), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court improperly raise sua sponte the issue of sufficiency of evidence with respect to the element of intent?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the evidence was insufficient on the element of the defendant's intent to commit the crime of tampering with physical evidence under General Statutes § 53a-49 (a) (2) ?"

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.3d 702, 331 Conn. 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stephenson-conn-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack