State v. Stephens

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Stephens

301 S.E.2d 473, 279 S.C. 33, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 260

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 23, 1983

Docket21889

StatusPublished

This text of 301 S.E.2d 473 (State v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stephens, 301 S.E.2d 473, 279 S.C. 33, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 260 (S.C. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant appeals from the lower court’s order vacating its earlier order granting appellant a new trial.

The record submitted by appellant does not contain sufficient facts for this Court to consider the propriety of the lower court’s action. Appellant has not met her burden of presenting a record on which the Court can base a decision. State v. Winestock, 271 S. C. 473, 248 S. E. (2d) 307 (1978).

We dismiss appellant’s appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Appellant appeals from the lower court’s order vacating its earlier order granting appellant a new trial.

The record submitted by appellant does not contain sufficient facts for this Court to consider the propriety of the lower court’s action. Appellant has not met her burden of presenting a record on which the Court can base a decision. State v. Winestock, 271 S. C. 473, 248 S. E. (2d) 307 (1978).

We dismiss appellant’s appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 S.E.2d 473, 279 S.C. 33, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stephens-sc-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack