State v. Stephens

301 S.E.2d 473, 279 S.C. 33, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 260
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 23, 1983·No. 21889·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant appeals from the lower court’s order vacating its earlier order granting appellant a new trial.

The record submitted by appellant does not contain sufficient facts for this Court to consider the propriety of the lower court’s action. Appellant has not met her burden of presenting a record on which the Court can base a decision. State v. Winestock, 271 S. C. 473, 248 S. E. (2d) 307 (1978).

We dismiss appellant’s appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stephens, 301 S.E.2d 473, 279 S.C. 33, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 260 (S.C. 1983).

301 S.E.2d 473 (State v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Winestock
248 S.E.2d 307 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1978)