State v. Stephen

Supreme Court of Alabama

State v. Stephen

15 Ala. 534

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1849

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 15 Ala. 534 (State v. Stephen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stephen, 15 Ala. 534 (Ala. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

CHILTON, J.

The prisoner was tried and convicted upon an indictment, charging him with the murder of one William Hadden, a white man. The jury returned their verdict as follows : “ We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of voluntary manslaughter.” The only question is, whether this verdict of the jury is sufficient to authorize the court to pronounce sentence upon the prisoner ? We are clearly of opinion that it is.

In Nancy, a slave, v. The State, 6 Ala. Rep. 483, this court held, that the omission of the jury to find the., entire charge, if it is sufficiently certain in ascertaining the guilt of the prisoner, as to any one offence which is included in the charge laid in the indictment, will not vitiate. In that case, as in this, the jury found the lesser offence, and their verdict was, that the prisoner was guilty of an assault with intent' to [535]*535kill, without stating, “ as charged in the bill of indictment.” This court say, it would seem absurd to conclude that the jury found any other assault than that named in the indictment. The facts of the case from which I have quoted, and the opinion of the court seem so apposite to the case at bar, as to render a further examination unnecessary. That case was well considered, and we are satisfied the court states the law correctly. Our conclusion is, that the judgment must be affirmed, and that sentence of death upon the verdict, be here pronounced against the prisoner, in accordance with the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHILTON, J.

The prisoner was tried and convicted upon an indictment, charging him with the murder of one William Hadden, a white man. The jury returned their verdict as follows : “ We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of voluntary manslaughter.” The only question is, whether this verdict of the jury is sufficient to authorize the court to pronounce sentence upon the prisoner ? We are clearly of opinion that it is.

In Nancy, a slave, v. The State, 6 Ala. Rep. 483, this court held, that the omission of the jury to find the., entire charge, if it is sufficiently certain in ascertaining the guilt of the prisoner, as to any one offence which is included in the charge laid in the indictment, will not vitiate. In that case, as in this, the jury found the lesser offence, and their verdict was, that the prisoner was guilty of an assault with intent' to [535]*535kill, without stating, “ as charged in the bill of indictment.” This court say, it would seem absurd to conclude that the jury found any other assault than that named in the indictment. The facts of the case from which I have quoted, and the opinion of the court seem so apposite to the case at bar, as to render a further examination unnecessary. That case was well considered, and we are satisfied the court states the law correctly. Our conclusion is, that the judgment must be affirmed, and that sentence of death upon the verdict, be here pronounced against the prisoner, in accordance with the statute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ala. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stephen-ala-1849.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack