State v. Stemmler

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stemmler

510 S.W.3d 896, 2017 WL 672162, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 80

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2017·No. WD 79067·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Nathanial Stemmier appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment convicting him of four counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree involving two victims. Stemmier asserts that the trial court erred in two respects: (1) in admitting and allowing the State to play a recording of one victim’s forensic interview; and (2) in overruling Stemmler’s motion for judgment of acquittal and entering judgment convicting him on one of the four counts because the evidence was insufficient to establish the location of his conduct beyond a reasonable doubt. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

Nathanial Stemmier appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment convicting him of four counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree involving two victims. Stemmier asserts that the trial court erred in two respects: (1) in admitting and allowing the State to play a recording of one victim’s forensic interview; and (2) in overruling Stemmler’s motion for judgment of acquittal and entering judgment convicting him on one of the four counts because the evidence was insufficient to establish the location of his conduct beyond a reasonable doubt. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Stemmler, 510 S.W.3d 896, 2017 WL 672162, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 80 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

510 S.W.3d 896 (State v. Stemmler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.