State v. Stember

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Stember

568 So. 2d 1274, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1584, 1990 WL 177001

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 8, 1990·No. No. 76161·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McDonald, justice.

In State v. Stember, 565 So.2d 725, 726 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), the court certified the following question as being of great public importance:

DO OFFICERS OF THE FLORIDA MARINE PATROL HAVE AUTHORITY TO DETAIN AND CITE DRIVERS FOR NONCRIMINAL TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We recently answered the same question in the affirmative in State v. Parsons, 569 So.2d 437 (Fla.1990). Therefore, we quash Stember and remand for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in Parsons.

It is so ordered.

[1275] SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald, justice.

In State v. Stember, 565 So.2d 725, 726 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), the court certified the following question as being of great public importance:

DO OFFICERS OF THE FLORIDA MARINE PATROL HAVE AUTHORITY TO DETAIN AND CITE DRIVERS FOR NONCRIMINAL TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We recently answered the same question in the affirmative in State v. Parsons, 569 So.2d 437 (Fla.1990). Therefore, we quash Stember and remand for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in Parsons.

It is so ordered.

[1275] SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

State v. Stember, 568 So. 2d 1274, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1584, 1990 WL 177001 (Fla. 1990).

Pincite

568 So. 2d 1274 (State v. Stember) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related