State v. Steinhausen

145 N.W.2d 584, 180 Neb. 778, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 603
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 21, 1966
Docket36300
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 145 N.W.2d 584 (State v. Steinhausen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Steinhausen, 145 N.W.2d 584, 180 Neb. 778, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 603 (Neb. 1966).

Opinion

Smith, J.

Defendant, having been convicted of assault with intent to commit rape, was sentenced to 2 years in the penal complex. He has appealed, contending that the district court erred in denying probation.

The evidence establishes that the contention of defendant is without merit. The action of the district court in imposing sentence and denying probation will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record shows an *779 abuse of discretion. See, § 29-2218, R. R. S. 1943; State v. Hylton, 175 Neb. 828, 124 N. W. 2d 230. There was no abuse in the present case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cottone
195 N.W.2d 196 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1972)
State v. Jurgens
192 N.W.2d 741 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Gilman
148 N.W.2d 847 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 N.W.2d 584, 180 Neb. 778, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-steinhausen-neb-1966.