State v. Steinhausen

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. Steinhausen

145 N.W.2d 584, 180 Neb. 778, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 603

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided October 21, 1966·No. 36300·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

Defendant, having been convicted of assault with intent to commit rape, was sentenced to 2 years in the penal complex. He has appealed, contending that the district court erred in denying probation.

The evidence establishes that the contention of defendant is without merit. The action of the district court in imposing sentence and denying probation will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record shows an *779 abuse of discretion. See, § 29-2218, R. R. S. 1943; State v. Hylton, 175 Neb. 828, 124 N. W. 2d 230. There was no abuse in the present case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

Defendant, having been convicted of assault with intent to commit rape, was sentenced to 2 years in the penal complex. He has appealed, contending that the district court erred in denying probation.

The evidence establishes that the contention of defendant is without merit. The action of the district court in imposing sentence and denying probation will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record shows an *779 abuse of discretion. See, § 29-2218, R. R. S. 1943; State v. Hylton, 175 Neb. 828, 124 N. W. 2d 230. There was no abuse in the present case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

State v. Steinhausen, 145 N.W.2d 584, 180 Neb. 778, 1966 Neb. LEXIS 603 (Neb. 1966).

Pincite

145 N.W.2d 584 (State v. Steinhausen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related