State v. STEINBRUEGGE

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. STEINBRUEGGE

224 S.W.3d 612, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 2007 WL 509677

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 20, 2007

DocketED 86461

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 224 S.W.3d 612 (State v. STEINBRUEGGE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. STEINBRUEGGE, 224 S.W.3d 612, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 302, 2007 WL 509677 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Adam Steinbruegge (“Defendant”) appeals from his convictions for first degree robbery, armed criminal action and possession of a controlled substance in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in not sustaining Defendant’s motion for directed verdict and his motion to remove a juror.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI