State v. Stein

312 So. 2d 221, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15035
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 1975·No. No. 75-2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida, feeling aggrieved by a dismissal of its appeal to the Circuit Court, acting in its appellate capacity, seeks a writ of certiorari from this court.

The Circuit Court dismissed the State’s appeal on a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant Erwin Stein (a/k/a Stern) which alleged that the state had failed to timely serve its brief upon the defendant-appellee.

The record reveals that the state had met all previous deadlines under the applicable appellate rules. Accepting the respondent’s contention that he did not receive the state’s brief by mail until October 17, 1974, we calculate that to be only three days late, excluding the weekend and an intervening holiday.

[222]*222Under the circumstances, we think that dismissal of the appeal was too harsh and accordingly the writ of certiorari is granted and the order entered by the circuit court is quashed with directions to proceed with the appeal.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stein, 312 So. 2d 221, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15035 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

312 So. 2d 221 (State v. Stein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leonard v. FIRST UNION NAT. BANK OF FLORIDA
685 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)