State v. Steger

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Steger

275 S.W.3d 322, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1610, 2008 WL 5456216

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2008·No. ED 90682·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*323 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of section 571.030.1(4) RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced defendant to four years imprisonment, suspended the execution of the sentence, and placed him on five years probation.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for them information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*323 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of section 571.030.1(4) RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced defendant to four years imprisonment, suspended the execution of the sentence, and placed him on five years probation.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for them information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Steger, 275 S.W.3d 322, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1610, 2008 WL 5456216 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

275 S.W.3d 322 (State v. Steger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related