State v. State Board of Assessors
39 A. 1114, 59 N.J.L. 269, 30 Vroom 269, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 36
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court below.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bark alow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. State Board of Assessors, 39 A. 1114, 59 N.J.L. 269, 30 Vroom 269, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 36 (N.J. 1896).
39 A. 1114 (State v. State Board of Assessors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas, Ltd. v. DEPT. OF THE TREASURY, OF NJ
298 A.2d 285 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1972)
Carle v. Carle Tool & Engineering Co.
114 A.2d 738 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Phillipsburg Horse Car Railroad v. State Board of Assessors
81 A. 1121 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1911)