State v. Starwood

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Starwood

558 So. 2d 573, 1990 La. LEXIS 600, 1990 WL 26255

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 9, 1990·No. No. 90-KH-0376·Published

Opinion

In re Starwood, Ronald; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 57789, 57790, 58535.

Denied. The district court record reflects that relator’s assertion of district court failure to address his July, 1989, pro se motions, as ordered by this Court in 89-KH-1900, is factually inaccurate. Court records reflect those motions were the subject of court proceedings on February 12, 1990. Relator’s petition for relief in connection with other complaints is premature, as he has not first petitioned the Court of Appeal, 1st Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Starwood, Ronald; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 57789, 57790, 58535.

Denied. The district court record reflects that relator’s assertion of district court failure to address his July, 1989, pro se motions, as ordered by this Court in 89-KH-1900, is factually inaccurate. Court records reflect those motions were the subject of court proceedings on February 12, 1990. Relator’s petition for relief in connection with other complaints is premature, as he has not first petitioned the Court of Appeal, 1st Circuit.

State v. Starwood, 558 So. 2d 573, 1990 La. LEXIS 600, 1990 WL 26255 (La. 1990).

Pincite

558 So. 2d 573 (State v. Starwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.