State v. Starling
42 So. 203, 90 Miss. 252
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The motion in this case is overruled. On the merits it is enough to say that the action of the court below was correct, for the reason that the indictment did not show how any pecuniary obligation was to be affected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Starling, 42 So. 203, 90 Miss. 252 (Mich. 1907).
42 So. 203 (State v. Starling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.