State v. Stansell

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Stansell

2022 Ohio 2064, 195 N.E.3d 129, 167 Ohio St. 3d 565

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 21, 2022

Docket2021-0948

StatusPublished

This text of 2022 Ohio 2064 (State v. Stansell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stansell, 2022 Ohio 2064, 195 N.E.3d 129, 167 Ohio St. 3d 565 (Ohio 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Stansell, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-2064.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-2064 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. STANSELL, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Stansell, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-2064.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2021-0948―Submitted May 24, 2022―Decided June 21, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 109023, 2021-Ohio-2036. _________________ {¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, GWIN, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. W. SCOTT GWIN, J., of the Fifth District Court of Appeals, sitting for STEWART, J. _________________ Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van and Frank Romeo Zeleznikar, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee. Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, Michael Stansell. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Benjamin M. Flowers, Solicitor General, and Zachery P. Keller, Deputy Solicitor General, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Attorney General. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Addison M. Spriggs, Assistant Public Defender, for amicus curiae Office of the Ohio Public Defender, in support of appellant. ________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Stansell, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-2064.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-2064 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. STANSELL, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Stansell, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-2064.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2021-0948―Submitted May 24, 2022―Decided June 21, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 109023, 2021-Ohio-2036. _________________ {¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, GWIN, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. W. SCOTT GWIN, J., of the Fifth District Court of Appeals, sitting for STEWART, J. _________________ Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van and Frank Romeo Zeleznikar, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee. Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, Michael Stansell. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Benjamin M. Flowers, Solicitor General, and Zachery P. Keller, Deputy Solicitor General, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Attorney General. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Addison M. Spriggs, Assistant Public Defender, for amicus curiae Office of the Ohio Public Defender, in support of appellant. ________________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2022 Ohio 2064, 195 N.E.3d 129, 167 Ohio St. 3d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stansell-ohio-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack