State v. Stanley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stanley

941 S.W.2d 668, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 292, 1997 WL 75877

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 25, 1997

DocketNo. 69793

StatusPublished

This text of 941 S.W.2d 668 (State v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stanley, 941 S.W.2d 668, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 292, 1997 WL 75877 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994. The court found defendant to be a prior offender and sentenced him to a prison term of four years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994. The court found defendant to be a prior offender and sentenced him to a prison term of four years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

941 S.W.2d 668, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 292, 1997 WL 75877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stanley-moctapp-1997.