State v. Stanley
1 Conn. Super. Ct. 25
This text of 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 25 (State v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Stanley, 1 Conn. Super. Ct. 25 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).
Opinion
[26]*26Pr. tot: Cur: Where the ftate attorney enters a nolle it is to be intended there was no caufe of action; and it is more conclufive than an acquittal of the Grand Jury; therefore coft cannot be taxed.—
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Conn. Super. Ct. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stanley-connsuperct-1787.