State v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Stanley

250 A.2d 326, 157 Conn. 625

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedFebruary 5, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 250 A.2d 326 (State v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stanley, 250 A.2d 326, 157 Conn. 625 (Colo. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit finding the defendant guilty as charged, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the judgments of the trial court and the [626]*626Appellate Division are set aside and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit with direction to render judgment that the defendant is not guilty and ordering that she be discharged.

Michael A. RaJcosky, assistant prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state). Joseph D. Harbaugh, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Argued February 4 decided February 5, 1969

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit finding the defendant guilty as charged, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the judgments of the trial court and the [626]*626Appellate Division are set aside and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit with direction to render judgment that the defendant is not guilty and ordering that she be discharged.

Michael A. RaJcosky, assistant prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state). Joseph D. Harbaugh, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Argued February 4 decided February 5, 1969

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.2d 326, 157 Conn. 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stanley-conn-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack