State v. Stanford

506 P.3d 498, 318 Or. App. 555

• Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
• Decided: March 23, 2022
• Docket: A172968
• Status: Published

Opinion

Submitted February 4; convictions on Counts 1 and 5 reversed and remanded, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed March 23, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHAYNA JOY STANFORD, Defendant-Appellant. Jackson County Circuit Court 19CR01529; A172968 506 P3d 498

David G. Hoppe, Judge. Shayna Joy Stanford filed the briefs for appellant pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Shannon T. Reel, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Convictions on Counts 1 and 5 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. 556 State v. Stanford

PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted after jury trial by non- unanimous verdicts of attempting to elude a police officer (Count 1) and resisting arrest (Count 5); she was convicted by unanimous verdicts of another count of attempting to elude a police officer (Count 2), driving under the influence of intoxicants (Count 3), and menacing (Count 4). On appeal, she raises five assignments of error, one of which is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury it could reach nonunanimous verdicts and accepting nonunanimous ver- dicts on Counts 1 and 5. The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in giving a nonunanimous jury instruction and in accepting nonunanimous jury verdicts on Counts 1 and 5, Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US ___, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020) (Sixth Amendment requires that the jury be unanimous to convict a criminal defendant of a serious offense), necessitating reversal and remand of those convictions. We reject defendant’s remaining assign- ments of error without discussion. Convictions on Counts 1 and 5 reversed and remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.