State v. Stanford
This text of 717 S.E.2d 561 (State v. Stanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Damien Kaseem STANFORD.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mark Montgomery, for Stanford, Damien Kaseem.
Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 26th of July 2011 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2011."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th of July 2011 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2011."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
717 S.E.2d 561, 365 N.C. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stanford-nc-2011.