State v. Stanciel

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stanciel

541 S.W.3d 715

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105331

StatusPublished

This text of 541 S.W.3d 715 (State v. Stanciel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stanciel, 541 S.W.3d 715 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jervell Stanciel ("Appellant") appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action following a jury trial. There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision to overrule Appellant's objection to the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jervell Stanciel ("Appellant") appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action following a jury trial. There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision to overrule Appellant's objection to the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 S.W.3d 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stanciel-moctapp-2018.