State v. Stanciel

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stanciel

541 S.W.3d 715

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2018·No. No. ED 105331·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jervell Stanciel ("Appellant") appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action following a jury trial. There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision to overrule Appellant's objection to the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jervell Stanciel ("Appellant") appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action following a jury trial. There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision to overrule Appellant's objection to the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Stanciel, 541 S.W.3d 715 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

541 S.W.3d 715 (State v. Stanciel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.