State v. Stanciel

970 S.W.2d 874, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1204, 1998 WL 326854
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Stanciel. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 827
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 1998·No. No. 72802·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kinzell Stanciel, was convicted, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree. He was sentenced to a seven year term of imprisonment. We affirm the judgment of conviction and remand for correction of the sentence.

Defendant first claims the trial court erred in sentencing him as a prior and persistent offender pursuant to Sections 558.016 and 557.036, RSMo (1994) because the State only proved one prior conviction. Defendant’s contention is supported by the record. The State agrees. Defendant’s first point is granted.

We have reviewed Defendant’s remaining points on appeal. No jurisprudential opinion would be served by a written opinion. Those points are denied. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. We remand for correction of the sentence in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stanciel, 970 S.W.2d 874, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1204, 1998 WL 326854 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

970 S.W.2d 874 (State v. Stanciel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.