State v. . Stancell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Stancell

188 S.E. 637, 210 N.C. 843, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 263

DecidedDecember 16, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 188 S.E. 637 (State v. . Stancell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Stancell, 188 S.E. 637, 210 N.C. 843, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 263 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PeRre Curiam.

The evidence at the trial of this action was properly submitted to the jury. There was no error in the refusal of the trial court to allow defendant’s motion that the action be dismissed. C. S., 4643.

The defendant, as a witness in his own behalf, denied that he was under the influence of intoxicating liquors or of narcotic drugs at the time he was arrested. His testimony was corroborated by other witnesses offered by him. The evidence for the State, however, was to the contrary. For this reason the issue was for the jury.

There was no error in the charge of the court to the jury. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeRre Curiam.

The evidence at the trial of this action was properly submitted to the jury. There was no error in the refusal of the trial court to allow defendant’s motion that the action be dismissed. C. S., 4643.

The defendant, as a witness in his own behalf, denied that he was under the influence of intoxicating liquors or of narcotic drugs at the time he was arrested. His testimony was corroborated by other witnesses offered by him. The evidence for the State, however, was to the contrary. For this reason the issue was for the jury.

There was no error in the charge of the court to the jury. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.E. 637, 210 N.C. 843, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stancell-nc-1936.