State v. Stamey

207 N.C. 854
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 19, 1934·Published

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

The only exception in the record challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the submittal of the case to the jury. The facts and circumstances bring the case within the principles heretofore applied in S. v. Shines, 125 N. C., 730, 34 S. E., 552; S. v. Allen, 149 N. C., 458, 62 S. E., 597; S. v. King, 162 N. C., 580, 77 S. E., 301; S. v. Clark, 173 N. C., 739, 91 S. E., 372.

No error.

SoheNCK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Stamey, 207 N.C. 854 (N.C. 1934).

207 N.C. 854 (State v. Stamey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Clark
91 S.E. 372 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
State v. King
77 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
State v. . Shines
34 S.E. 552 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
State v. . Allen
62 S.E. 597 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)