State v. Stallings

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stallings

526 S.W.3d 236, 2017 WL 2241514, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 486

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 23, 2017·No. WD 78868·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kelon Stallings appeals his convictions for second-degree felony murder, armed criminal action, and attempted burglary in the first degree following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Each conviction was based on a theory of accomplice liability. On appeal, Stallings attacks the sufficiency of the evidence supporting each of his convictions and argues that the trial court erred in denying his Batson challenge. We find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memorandum of law to the parties explaining our ruling. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kelon Stallings appeals his convictions for second-degree felony murder, armed criminal action, and attempted burglary in the first degree following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Each conviction was based on a theory of accomplice liability. On appeal, Stallings attacks the sufficiency of the evidence supporting each of his convictions and argues that the trial court erred in denying his Batson challenge. We find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memorandum of law to the parties explaining our ruling. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Stallings, 526 S.W.3d 236, 2017 WL 2241514, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

526 S.W.3d 236 (State v. Stallings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.