State v. Stallings

3 Ind. 531
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1852
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ind. 531 (State v. Stallings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stallings, 3 Ind. 531 (Ind. 1852).

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Indictment for gaming. Indictment quashed in the Circuit Court. It presents, in one count, that Andrew Stallings, late, &c., on, &c., at, &c., did unlawfully win in a bet made at a game of cards played by said Stallings and others, some named and some unknown, the sum of 10 cents.

The second count charges that he lost said sum in a bet made at a game of cards played by, &c.

The indictment does not show whether the bet was [532]*532made with the persons played with, or with some third person, a spectator of the game, and is bad for uncertainty.

A. L. Robinson, for the state. J. Pitcher, for the defendant.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ind. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stallings-ind-1852.