State v. Stahl

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Stahl

534 So. 2d 1250, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5618, 1988 WL 135348

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 21, 1988

DocketNo. 88-0477

StatusPublished

This text of 534 So. 2d 1250 (State v. Stahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stahl, 534 So. 2d 1250, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 158, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5618, 1988 WL 135348 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of appellee’s sentence and argues that the trial court erred in departing downward from the recommended guidelines sentence. We agree and reverse on the authority of State v. Peters, 500 So.2d 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and State v. Caride, 473 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Accordingly, this sentence is reversed and remanded with directions to the trial court to resentence appellee within the recommended guidelines sentence.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI