State v. Stackhouse

2017 Ohio 6949
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 24, 2017
Docket2017-A-0032
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 6949 (State v. Stackhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Stackhouse, 2017 Ohio 6949 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Stackhouse, 2017-Ohio-6949.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2017-A-0032 - vs - :

TYRICE STACKHOUSE, :

Defendant-Appellant. :

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2016 CR 00379.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

Nicholas A. Iarocci, Ashtabula County Prosecutor, Ashtabula County Courthouse, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH 44047-1092 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Tyrice Stackhouse, pro se, PID: A693-560, Lake Erie Correctional Institution. P.O. Box 8000, 501 Thompson Road, Conneaut, OH 44030 (Defendant-Appellant).

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.

{¶1} On May 24, 2017, appellant, Tyrice Stackhouse, pro se, filed a Motion for

Leave to File a Delayed Appeal pursuant to App.R. 5(A). No notice of appeal or

docketing statement was filed with the trial court.

{¶2} Further, there was no judgment entry provided by appellant from which he

appeals. However, the trial court docket reflects an entry time-stamped February 22,

2017, sentencing appellant to serve six years in prison after he entered a plea of guilty

to trafficking in heroin. {¶3} App.R. 5(A) provides:

{¶4} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶5} “(a) Criminal proceedings;

{¶6} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and

{¶7} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.

{¶8} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of

right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the

trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of

the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals. The movant also shall furnish an

additional copy of the notice of appeal and a copy of the motion for leave to appeal to

the clerk of the court of appeals who shall serve the notice of appeal and the motions

upon the prosecuting attorney.” (Emphasis added.)

{¶9} In the present case, appellant has not complied with App.R. 5(A) because

he failed to file a notice of appeal in the trial court concurrently with the filing of his

motion for leave to appeal. See State v. Fisher, 46 Ohio App.2d 279 (1975). In

addition, appellant has not complied with Loc.R. 3(D)(2) of this court by attaching to

such notice of appeal a copy of the judgment entry being appealed.

{¶10} In light of the foregoing, appellant’s present motion is procedurally

defective, and he has failed to invoke this court’s jurisdiction.

2 {¶11} We note that appellant is not barred from filing a new motion for leave to

appeal along with a notice of appeal that complies with the Ohio Rules of Appellate

Procedure and the local rules of this court.

{¶12} Accordingly, it is ordered that appellant’s pro se motion for leave to file a

delayed appeal is hereby overruled.

{¶13} Appeal dismissed.

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J.

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J.,

concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fisher
349 N.E.2d 327 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 6949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stackhouse-ohioctapp-2017.