State v. Spruill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Spruill

571 S.E.2d 209, 356 N.C. 296, 2002 N.C. LEXIS 945

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 3, 2002

Docket404A92-4

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 571 S.E.2d 209 (State v. Spruill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Spruill, 571 S.E.2d 209, 356 N.C. 296, 2002 N.C. LEXIS 945 (N.C. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Defendant’s petition for Writ of Certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following orders:

The 1 October 2001 order of Superior Court Judge Cy Grant denying defendant’s third Motion for Appropriate Relief, filed 5 June 2001, is vacated. Defendant may file amendments to his fourth Motion for Appropriate Relief, now pending in the Superior Court, Northampton County, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(g). Notwithstanding the provisions of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(g), defendant shall have at least 30 days prior to the date of a hearing on the merits in which to file amendments.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 3rd day of October, 2002, at 11:00 a.m.

Edmunds, J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI