State v. Spruill

571 S.E.2d 209, 356 N.C. 296, 2002 N.C. LEXIS 945
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 3, 2002·No. 404A92-4·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Defendant’s petition for Writ of Certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following orders:

The 1 October 2001 order of Superior Court Judge Cy Grant denying defendant’s third Motion for Appropriate Relief, filed 5 June 2001, is vacated. Defendant may file amendments to his fourth Motion for Appropriate Relief, now pending in the Superior Court, Northampton County, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(g). Notwithstanding the provisions of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(g), defendant shall have at least 30 days prior to the date of a hearing on the merits in which to file amendments.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 3rd day of October, 2002, at 11:00 a.m.

Edmunds, J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Spruill, 571 S.E.2d 209, 356 N.C. 296, 2002 N.C. LEXIS 945 (N.C. 2002).

571 S.E.2d 209 (State v. Spruill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Starner
571 S.E.2d 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)