State v. Sprinkle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Sprinkle

565 So. 2d 930, 1990 La. LEXIS 2030, 1990 WL 128247

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 6, 1990

DocketNo. 89-KH-0444

StatusPublished

This text of 565 So. 2d 930 (State v. Sprinkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sprinkle, 565 So. 2d 930, 1990 La. LEXIS 2030, 1990 WL 128247 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Sprinkle, Jimmy; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 319-198; Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 244-896.

Granted and remanded to the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the question of whether the 1974 gulty plea in 244-896-1 was voluntarily and intelligently entered by the relator. See, State v. Warren, 402 So.2d 662 (La.1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Sprinkle, Jimmy; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 319-198; Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 244-896.

Granted and remanded to the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the question of whether the 1974 gulty plea in 244-896-1 was voluntarily and intelligently entered by the relator. See, State v. Warren, 402 So.2d 662 (La.1981).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

565 So. 2d 930, 1990 La. LEXIS 2030, 1990 WL 128247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sprinkle-la-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack