State v. Spreitzer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Spreitzer

659 So. 2d 1110, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5101, 1995 WL 275764

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2833

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 659 So. 2d 1110 (State v. Spreitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Spreitzer, 659 So. 2d 1110, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5101, 1995 WL 275764 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state has filed a petition for certiorari seeking review of a decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity, affirming an order of the county court suppressing evidence of several statements made by defendant who was charged with DUI. Defendant was stopped for traffic infractions and erratic operation of his motor vehicle but was not “Mirandized” prior to responding to the deputy’s questions and performing certain roadside tests.

This case is controlled by this court’s recent opinion in State v. Burns, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D807 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 31, 1995). Accordingly, we grant certiorari, quash the lower court’s order and remand with directions to reverse the suppression order, except as it relates to statements made by the defendant while being transported.

WRIT GRANTED, ORDER QUASHED and REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI