State v. Sprang
Opinion
Defendant, a building contractor, was convicted on three counts of aggravated theft in the first degree, ORS 164.057, for misappropriating money he had received to perform work on the residences of three victims. As part of his sentence, the trial court ordered that he make restitution to the victims. ORS 137.106. Defendant assigns error to that ruling, claiming that a preconviction discharge in bankruptcy of his civil debt to the victims bars the restitution order.
In State v. Davis, 116 Or App 607, 610, 843 P2d 460 (1992), we applied Kelly v. Robinson, 479 US 36, 50, 107 S Ct 353, 93 L Ed 2d 216 (1986), to hold that a chapter 7 discharge in bankruptcy does not discharge the obligation to make restitution that is imposed as part of a criminal sentence.1 It is not relevant whether the discharge in bankruptcy occurred after the restitution order, as in Kelly, or before the restitution order, as in Davis. See State v. Moriarty, 87 Or App 465, 470, 742 P2d 704, rev den 304 Or 547 (1987) (statute does not require that civil damages be recoverable at the time restitution is imposed).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
904 P.2d 1092 (State v. Sprang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.