State v. Sprague

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sprague

81 Mo. App. 408, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 423

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 31, 1899·Published

Opinion

BIGGS, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of petit larceny. He was sentenced to the work-house for one year. He has appealed the case to .this court.

Neither party has favored us with briefs. We have examined the record and find no error. The information is in the usual form, charging’ the defendant with stealing nineteen dollars, the property of the prosecuting witness. The evidence of the state tends to prove the accusation. The instructions are unobjectionable and the verdict and judgment are regular.

The judgment will be affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIGGS, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of petit larceny. He was sentenced to the work-house for one year. He has appealed the case to .this court.

Neither party has favored us with briefs. We have examined the record and find no error. The information is in the usual form, charging’ the defendant with stealing nineteen dollars, the property of the prosecuting witness. The evidence of the state tends to prove the accusation. The instructions are unobjectionable and the verdict and judgment are regular.

The judgment will be affirmed.

All concur.

State v. Sprague, 81 Mo. App. 408, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 423 (Mo. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

81 Mo. App. 408 (State v. Sprague) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.