State v. Sprague

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sprague

81 Mo. App. 408, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 423

DecidedOctober 31, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 81 Mo. App. 408 (State v. Sprague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sprague, 81 Mo. App. 408, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 423 (Mo. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

BIGGS, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of petit larceny. He was sentenced to the work-house for one year. He has appealed the case to .this court.

Neither party has favored us with briefs. We have examined the record and find no error. The information is in the usual form, charging’ the defendant with stealing nineteen dollars, the property of the prosecuting witness. The evidence of the state tends to prove the accusation. The instructions are unobjectionable and the verdict and judgment are regular.

The judgment will be affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIGGS, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of petit larceny. He was sentenced to the work-house for one year. He has appealed the case to .this court.

Neither party has favored us with briefs. We have examined the record and find no error. The information is in the usual form, charging’ the defendant with stealing nineteen dollars, the property of the prosecuting witness. The evidence of the state tends to prove the accusation. The instructions are unobjectionable and the verdict and judgment are regular.

The judgment will be affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 Mo. App. 408, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sprague-moctapp-1899.