State v. Spotville

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Spotville

346 So. 2d 221, 1977 La. LEXIS 5004

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 8, 1977

DocketNo. 59911

StatusPublished

This text of 346 So. 2d 221 (State v. Spotville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Spotville, 346 So. 2d 221, 1977 La. LEXIS 5004 (La. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Granted.

[222]*222The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Salva-dore T. Mule, Judge of the Juvenile, Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 29th day of June, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Granted.

[222]*222The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Salva-dore T. Mule, Judge of the Juvenile, Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 29th day of June, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

346 So. 2d 221, 1977 La. LEXIS 5004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-spotville-la-1977.