State v. Spivey

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

State v. Spivey

300 A.2d 277, 111 R.I. 908, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 1301

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Spivey. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 R.I. 43 →

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 15, 1973·No. C. A. No. 1979·Published

Opinion

Motion of defendant to supplement the record is granted without prejudice [909]*909to right of the state to renew its objections at the hearing on the merits.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. William F. Reilly, Public Defender, Allegra Munson, Special Counsel, Public Defender Department, Joseph M. Hall, Asst. Public Defender, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of defendant to supplement the record is granted without prejudice [909]*909to right of the state to renew its objections at the hearing on the merits.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff. William F. Reilly, Public Defender, Allegra Munson, Special Counsel, Public Defender Department, Joseph M. Hall, Asst. Public Defender, for defendant.

State v. Spivey, 300 A.2d 277, 111 R.I. 908, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 1301 (R.I. 1973).

Pincite

300 A.2d 277 (State v. Spivey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.