State v. Spisak

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Spisak

926 N.E.2d 311, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1421

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 12, 2010

Docket1986-1099

StatusPublished

This text of 926 N.E.2d 311 (State v. Spisak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Spisak, 926 N.E.2d 311, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1421 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 47458 and 47459. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellee’s motion to set execution date. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to set execution date is granted.

It is further ordered by the court that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Thursday, February 17, 2011, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

It is further ordered that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County.

Brown, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 47458 and 47459. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellee’s motion to set execution date. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to set execution date is granted.

It is further ordered by the court that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Thursday, February 17, 2011, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

It is further ordered that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County.

Brown, C.J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

926 N.E.2d 311, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-spisak-ohio-2010.