Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Spirko

State v. Spirko

640 N.E.2d 841, 70 Ohio St. 3d 1221, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2429
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 9, 1994·No. No. 89-722·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We deny the motion. Spirko’s 1991 appeal to this court was not a first appeal as of right; therefore, he had no constitutional right to counsel, hence no constitutional right to effective assistance. See State v. Buell (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 1211, 639 N.E.2d 110.

Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Spirko, 640 N.E.2d 841, 70 Ohio St. 3d 1221, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2429 (Ohio 1994).

640 N.E.2d 841 (State v. Spirko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Buell
639 N.E.2d 110 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)