State v. Spioch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Spioch

675 So. 2d 712, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6847, 1996 WL 354613

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 28, 1996

DocketNo. 95-1533

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 675 So. 2d 712 (State v. Spioch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Spioch, 675 So. 2d 712, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6847, 1996 WL 354613 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

The state has appealed the lower court’s order granting Thomas H. Spioch, III [“Spioch”] a new trial on five counts of sexual activity or attempted sexual activity with a child while Spioch was in a position of custodial authority over the child. Spioch was convicted on a total of twenty-eight counts, the remaining twenty-three of which charged [713]*713lewd and lascivious conduct. All twenty-eight counts involved the same young male victim. Spioch has cross-appealed the lower court’s denial of Spioch’s motion for new trial on the remaining twenty-three counts. We have considered all issues raised both on appeal and on cross-appeal and find no error.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, Judge.

The state has appealed the lower court’s order granting Thomas H. Spioch, III [“Spioch”] a new trial on five counts of sexual activity or attempted sexual activity with a child while Spioch was in a position of custodial authority over the child. Spioch was convicted on a total of twenty-eight counts, the remaining twenty-three of which charged [713]*713lewd and lascivious conduct. All twenty-eight counts involved the same young male victim. Spioch has cross-appealed the lower court’s denial of Spioch’s motion for new trial on the remaining twenty-three counts. We have considered all issues raised both on appeal and on cross-appeal and find no error.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

675 So. 2d 712, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6847, 1996 WL 354613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-spioch-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack