State v. Spilde
This text of 543 N.W.2d 94 (State v. Spilde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 5, 1995, affirming the conviction of Dean Elliott Spilde of misdemeanor DWI/refusal to submit to testing be, and the same is, affirmed. Spilde contends that the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the implied consent law barred the subsequent criminal prosecution of him for DWI/refusal to submit to testing under the double jeopardy clause. This contention is answered by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d 84 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 N.W.2d 94, 1996 WL 50922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-spilde-minn-1996.