State v. Spies
This text of State v. Spies (State v. Spies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 24-NOV-2023 08:04 AM Dkt. 26 ODSLJ NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JONATHAN P. SPIES, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3CPC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that self-
represented Defendant-Appellant Jonathan P. Spies (Spies) appeals
from the March 28, 2023 "Order Denying (1) Defendant's Notice of
Protest, Opposition of the Taking of Personal and Subject Matter
Jurisdiction; (2) Defense Counsel Motion to Withdraw for Limited
Purposes of Motion Filed March 6, 2023 [Dkt. 186]" (March 28,
2023 Order). We conclude that the court lacks jurisdiction over
the appeal because the March 28, 2023 Order is not an order or
judgment that finally determines, and thus ends, all proceedings
leaving nothing further to be accomplished, Hawaii Revised
Statutes (HRS) § 641-11 (2016), State v. Nicol, 140 Hawai i 482,
492, 403 P.3d 259, 269 (2017), it has not been certified for
interlocutory appeal, see HRS § 641–17 (2016), and it is not an NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
appealable collateral order. State v. Baranco, 77 Hawai i 351,
355, 884 P.2d 729, 7331–32 (1994) (citation omitted).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
dismissed.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are
dismissed as moot.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, November 24, 2023.
/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge
1 This order does not affect Spies's separate appeal in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX from the June 9, 2023 Judgment of Conviction and Sentence entered in the underlying case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Spies, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-spies-hawapp-2023.