State v. Spenlove

22 S.C.L. 269
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 14, 1837
StatusPublished

This text of 22 S.C.L. 269 (State v. Spenlove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Spenlove, 22 S.C.L. 269 (S.C. Ct. App. 1837).

Opinion

Mr. Justice O’Neall

delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion, that there is no evidence of the guilt of the prisoner. The only suspicious circumstance against him is, that he gave an account of the acquisition of the kids by a sailor, which may not be true. But there is no evidence that he ever had possession} .or in any way concerned in depriving the owner of them.

The motion for a new trial is granted.

JOHN B. O’NEALL.

We concur,

RICHARD GANTT, JOSIAH J. EVANS. J. S. RICHARDSON,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.C.L. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-spenlove-scctapp-1837.