State v. Spencer
This text of 353 P.3d 1253 (State v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant challenges his conviction of felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm, ORS 166.270 and ORS 161.610.1 Specifically, he assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal of that charge.2 Defendant argues that a person who has been convicted of a felony is not a felon for the purposes of the crime of felon in possession of a firearm if a judgment reducing the felony to a misdemeanor was in effect at the time the person was alleged to have possessed a firearm.3 Here, defendant was convicted of hindering prosecution, a felony, in 2004. In 2007, however, a trial court reduced the felony to a misdemeanor offense. Thus, defendant contends, when he possessed a firearm in 2012, which was the basis for the charge of felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm, he was not a felon for the purposes of the conviction, and the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. The state concedes the error, and we accept the concession.
Felon in possession of a firearm with a firearm conviction reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 P.3d 1253, 272 Or. App. 164, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-spencer-orctapp-2015.