State v. Spencer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Spencer

744 P.2d 1009, 88 Or. App. 300, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4992

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 12, 1987

DocketDA335277; CA A44235

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 744 P.2d 1009 (State v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Spencer, 744 P.2d 1009, 88 Or. App. 300, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4992 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a trial court order which denied his motion to dismiss on the ground of former jeopardy. There is no judgment of conviction or any basis for an interlocutory appeal in this case. ORS 138.040. Defendant does not seek a writ of mandamus. See State ex rel Wark v. Freerksen, 84 Or App 90, 733 P2d 100 (1987). The order denying his motion is not appealable. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a trial court order which denied his motion to dismiss on the ground of former jeopardy. There is no judgment of conviction or any basis for an interlocutory appeal in this case. ORS 138.040. Defendant does not seek a writ of mandamus. See State ex rel Wark v. Freerksen, 84 Or App 90, 733 P2d 100 (1987). The order denying his motion is not appealable. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

744 P.2d 1009, 88 Or. App. 300, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-spencer-orctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack