State v. Spencer
744 P.2d 1009, 88 Or. App. 300, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4992
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 12, 1987·No. DA335277; CA A44235·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a trial court order which denied his motion to dismiss on the ground of former jeopardy. There is no judgment of conviction or any basis for an interlocutory appeal in this case. ORS 138.040. Defendant does not seek a writ of mandamus. See State ex rel Wark v. Freerksen, 84 Or App 90, 733 P2d 100 (1987). The order denying his motion is not appealable. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Spencer, 744 P.2d 1009, 88 Or. App. 300, 1987 Ore. App. LEXIS 4992 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).
744 P.2d 1009 (State v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Salzmann
850 P.2d 1122 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)