State v. Spencer

197 S.E.2d 247, 18 N.C. App. 578, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1946
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Spencer. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 N.C. App. 499
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided June 27, 1973·No. No. 732SC385·Published

Opinion

BROCK, Judge.

Defendant was represented by counsel during his trial and on this appellate review. The bill of indictment is proper in form and sufficient to charge the felony of murder. The court [580]*580was properly organized and had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person of defendant. Trial was by jury which found defendant guilty of second degree murder. The evidence was sufficient to overcome defendant’s motion for nonsuit, and to require submission of the case to the jury. The verdict' was proper in form and the prison sentence imposed is within statutory limits.

We have reviewed the record and in our opinion defendant had a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Britt and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Spencer, 197 S.E.2d 247, 18 N.C. App. 578, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1946 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

197 S.E.2d 247 (State v. Spencer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.