State v. Spellman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Spellman

594 So. 2d 879, 1992 La. LEXIS 1101, 1992 WL 54385

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Spellman. Read the opinion of the Court — 562 So. 2d 455 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 12, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-0531·Published

Opinion

In re Spellman, John E.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 61-337, 62-856.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post conviction relief on or about January 7, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Spellman, John E.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 61-337, 62-856.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post conviction relief on or about January 7, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State v. Spellman, 594 So. 2d 879, 1992 La. LEXIS 1101, 1992 WL 54385 (La. 1992).

Pincite

594 So. 2d 879 (State v. Spellman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.