State v. Spell

775 So. 2d 291, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 13, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2, 2001 WL 8329
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 4, 2001·No. No. SC95641·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of Spell v. State, 731 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), based on express and direct conflict with Fitzhugh v. State, 698 So.2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Spell, 775 So. 2d 291, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 13, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2, 2001 WL 8329 (Fla. 2001).

775 So. 2d 291 (State v. Spell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitzhugh v. State
698 So. 2d 571 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Spell v. State
731 So. 2d 9 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)